The series tells the story of an eleven-year-old orphan,
despised by the relatives he lives with, who discovers he
has a rare talent and works hard to develop it. In the course
of his education he learns to think for himself, to be honest
and to be self-confident.He finds friends who share his values
and he earns the respect of his teachers. He battles the class
bully as well as the most evil wizard on earth, and we rejoice
when, with considerable effort and courage, Harry prevails.
What is the educational value of this? Children need to learn
concrete facts, of course, but that is not enough. In order
to organize and utilize such facts, a child urgently needs
as a framework a basic, abstract view of life—and he needs
it in the form, not of an abstruse treatise, but of a concise,
easily graspable presentation.
This is what literature provides. By means of the theme,
plot and characterization—particularly as they involve the
hero—every children’s story implicitly addresses such broad
questions as: Is the world fundamentally a benevolent or a
malevolent place? Can one rely on one’s own mind or not? Is
life to be eagerly embraced or fearfully skirted? Can the
good succeed or does evil ultimately win?
The Harry Potter series appeals to so many children (and,
incidentally, adults) because the answers it gives to these
questions are overwhelmingly positive. It shows a world in
which happiness can be achieved, villains can be defeated,
and the means of success can be learned. When my seven-year-old
races around the dining room table swathed in an old bathrobe,
with a broomstick made of a mini-blind wand and cardboard,
she is not expressing an interest in witches or the supernatural.
Rather, she is trying on the personality of an independent,
courageous, intelligent individual who conquers evil. She
is enthusiastically endorsing a positive philosophic perspective
on herself and on the world.
It is a story’s abstract meaning, not its physical setting,
that influences the reader. The Wizard of Oz, for example,
is set in a land inhabited by witches, Munchkins and talking
trees—but it really is about the determination of Dorothy
and her friends to attain difficult goals. Little Lord Fauntleroy
is not a manual for how to inherit an earldom, but a portrayal
of a child whose honesty and integrity see him through adversity.
By contrast, consider the ghoulishly titled Say Cheese and
Die! (from the popular Goosebumps series, by R. L. Stine).
Here, a cursed camera causes death and destruction whenever
it snaps a photo. The main character, who repeatedly capitulates
to his friends’ insistence that he use the camera, is cowardly,
panic-stricken and ineffectual. The story ends on a foreboding
note, as the hiding place of the indestructible camera is
discovered by local bullies, who prepare to use the camera
again.
This book is appalling not for its supernatural elements
but for its sheer malevolence: the “hero” is powerless, innocuous-looking
objects wreak devastation, evil is invincible. A child overexposed
to the malevolent universe of Goosebumps—or Beavis and Butthead,
or South Park—might well wonder why he should risk getting
out of bed in the morning, never mind why he should strive
to master his schoolwork or to excel in sports.
What crucial need does the Harry Potter series fill? In a
culture where fear and cynicism are too often dominant, it
provides a reminder that life is good—that it is challenging
and full of exciting possibilities. The books are, in short,
fuel for a child’s maturing mind. As vitamins and minerals
are essential to a child’s healthy physical development, so
literature with this view of the world is essential to a child’s
healthy mental development.
Dr. Durante is a senior writer for the Ayn Rand Institute
in Irvine, California. The Institute promotes the philosophy
of Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead.
Send comments to reaction@aynrand.org.