|
|
Chicago: dark, funny, too good
to miss
by April Tashiro, Art & Entertainment editor
| |
|
|
Bob Fosse and Fred Ebb’s 1975 Broadway musical, Chicago, comes
to the silver screen at the hands of former Broadway hoofer
Rob Marshall. Winning three Golden Globes and nominated for
13 Oscars, Chicago has prove itself to be one of the best films
of this year, one that should not be missed.
In the jazzy 1920s Chicago, Roxie Hart (Renee Zellweger) dreams
of becoming a singer, and has an affair with a furniture salesman
who claims a connection to stardom. When she finds out his lie,
she murders him and ends up in jail, where she meets a star
singer of the city, Velma
|
|
|
|
Click on image for
larger view
|
|
| Kelly (Catherine Zeta-Jones). Velma is in jail for
double murder — her husband and sister, who were being more than
friendly. Having a top-notch attorney, Billy Flynn (Richard Gere),
as her ticket to freedom, Velma is now enjoying new-found fame
from the scandal. |
|
|
| The fame comes to an end when Roxie hires Flynn
as well, thanks to her faithful husband’s (John C. Reilly) love
and effort. The media attention shifts from Velma to Roxie, creating
a deadly conflict between them. In the corrupt city of the Prohibition-Era,
there is room enough for only one celebrity murderess, and both
of them are willing to do whatever it takes to be just that. |
|
|
|
A cynical fairytale of stardom with twists of dark humor, Chicago
is a 113-minute roller-coaster ride of music, dance, and drama.
Unlike conventional musical films, in which songs decorate a
story, in Chicago the music numbers create the story itself,
leaving very little time for nonmusical parts. Yet, they are
woven so well together that the story moves smoothly, probably
because instead of people starting to sing in the middle of
conversations, most of the numbers in the film start from inside
of Roxie’s head, reflecting the way she sees reality.
|
|
|
|
Click on image for
larger view
|
|
|
|
|
One of many memorable numbers is “Cell Block Tango,” where
female inmates sing and dance their stories of how they committed
murders and why. Choreographed powerfully with a red handkerchief
as the symbol of blood, it leaves strong impressions of each
character’s personality and past. What the film accomplished
very successfully throughout is depicting the characters efficiently
and firmly, tightly packing the essence of them into songs,
never letting the audience wonder about their uniqueness by
establishing it strongly.
|
|
|
|
Moreover, the acting — including singing and dancing in this
case — is excellent. Once a professional dancer, Zeta-Jones
plays her role confidently, expressing Velma’s strength and
dark convictions through passionate and sexual dances. Her number,
“All That Jazz,” has been made into a music video, and is one
of the best songs in the film. And her co-star, Zellweger, sings
her high-note numbers lovably and charmingly, creating a distinguishing
contrast of these two characters who share the same single desire.
Gere seems to gives a rather weak impression of Billy at first,
being sandwiched between two strong actresses who play strong
characters. It is evident especially in his first number, “All
I Care About,” where he dances in his boxers and undershirt,
singing in a mellow voice. Yet, he has a very good scene toward
the end, when Billy gives an amazing tap dance performance while
defending Roxie at her trial, smoking away everybody in the
courtroom. Whether it is or is not Gere who is dancing as suggested
by Michael Wilmington of TheChicago Tribune, the number is sure
to make the audience “razzle-dazzle,” as it does the jury.
Not only the leading actors, but also supporting actors and
actresses give strong performances to the film. Being a singer,
Queen Latifah (“When You’re Good to Mama”) is delightful as
a prison matron, while a character actor, Reilly, in the role
of Roxie’s naïve husband (“Mister Cellophane”), captures the
sadness of an empty theater.
However, some in the audience might not enjoy the intensity
of 113 minutes with few breaks between numbers, and even though
it is appealing in its own way, when Chicago is compared to
the recent musical hit Moulin Rouge, it is neither as colorful
nor as vivid, creating a much smaller scale of the world it
presents.
One possible reason might be where it was shot, as Wilmington
pointed out, mostly in Toronto. He wrote, “And though it’s true
that the film is a period recreation, it suffers from a lack
of any real sense of the city, any open air or any views of
Lake Michigan.”
Overall Chicago is too good, too entertaining, and too talked
about to miss. Even if it does not win many Oscars, or even
if you are not really enthusiastic about musicals, it’s still
a worthwhile film to see.
|
|
|
|
|
|