|
|
Mark Smith, editor
| |
|
Letter to the
Editor
I would like to correct a factual error that
appeared in an opinion piece by Michael Coffey, entitled “Great
Works Missing from HPU Curriculum” (April 26, 2004).
He writes, “Currently our curriculum - for Political
Science, International Relations, Humanities, Classics programs,
and potentially History - is almost entirely devoid of the
great works.”
|
|
| |
|
'Health'
must be redefined in late term abortions
In 1973, Sandra Cano and Norma McCorvey, plaintiffs
of two of the most significant cases on abortion, didn’t
realize they were putting themselves into a position of sparking
an ongoing national controversy over women’s right
to choose.
|
|
| |
|
Not having
to see yourself for who you are: Politics without mirrors
In a current Supreme Court case, Michael Newdow
has challenged the constitutionality of reading the Pledge
of Allegiance in public schools. Newdow, an atheist, argues
that the pledge’s reference to America as “one
nation, under God,” constitutes governmental establishment
of religion. The Bush administration counters that the pledge
is “a patriotic exercise, not a religious testimonial,” and
should be allowed.
|
|
| |
|
Campaign finance reform attacks
victims
In upholding the major provisions of the McCain-Feingold
Campaign Finance Law, the Supreme Court has openly declared
that it is legitimate to curtail freedom of speech “marginally” in
order to fight government corruption. The sad reality is that
the new laws not only fail to confront the source of corruption
in government, but by violating free speech, they heap even
more injustices upon the “victims” of such corruption.
|
|
|