The investigation, which was led by scientist
Seth Schulman, first reported incidents of information distortion
at federal agencies. The first of these issues involved humans’ contribution
to global warming. The report accused the Bush Administration
of distorting the public’s understanding of global warming
by suppressing formation on human causes—human production
of carbon dioxide and other gases that contribute to it.
The UCS also reported that the Bush Administration had censored
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), an independent
group, by completely removing the section on climate change
from its
annual air pollution report in September 2002.
According to the UCS, the Bush Administration also deleted
information regarding mercury emissions from power plants
in another EPA
report, this time leaked by a frustrated EPA official in
February 2003 to the Wall Street Journal. Had the official
not leaked
the draft report, the White House would have been successful
in preventing the report from reaching the public.
Yet another case of report tampering by the Bush Administration
involving the EPA took place in June 2003. In this case,
the Bush Administration “blatantly tampered” with the
EPA’s draft of the Report on the Environment by trying
to make numerous changes to the report. This case was brought
to the public’s eye by The New York Times; however, the
altering of these reports and other information continued. Russell
Train, former EPA administrator during the terms of Presidents
Nixon and Ford, wrote to The New York Times following these incidents,
calling the Bush Administration’s actions “virtually
unprecedented for the degree of their political manipulation.”
These are by no means isolated incidents by President
Bush, despite his statement in 2001 that his “administration’s
climate change policy will be science-based.”
Recently, the war with Iraq has become the key focus
of the public’s
attention. Also coming to light is information regarding the
Bush Administration’s hasty decision to go to war. The
UCS has also found evidence that the Bush Administration misinformed
the public and the United Nations (UN).
In his address to the UN’s Security Council on February
5, 2003, Secretary of State Colin Powell convinced the council
that Iraq was manufacturing weapons of mass destruction. The
evidence he claimed was that Iraq was receiving a shipment of
more than 100,000 aluminum tubes to use in enriching uranium,
which is a key ingredient in nuclear weapons. When the shipment
was intercepted and officials and experts from the CIA and the
Department of Energy (DOE) reported that the tubes were not conducive
to enriching uranium, the Bush Administration ignored them. The
Bush Administration instead used a second opinion from the State
Department’s Intelligence branch, and Secretary Powell “lumped” the
CIA and DOE experts with the Iraqis in his speech. Thus, through
their alteration of information, the Bush Administration successfully
persuaded the public and Congress to support its war with Iraq.
Anyone who reads Kalamalama will remember the article
regarding humanity’s contribution to the sixth Great Extinction.
The Bush Administration is doing its part to contribute to what
may ultimately lead to humanity’s own extinction. The UCS
report also accuses the Bush Administration of “being engaged
in a systematic attempt to weaken the Endangered Species Act.” The
Bush Administration is currently supporting legislation that
would make it harder for new threatened or endangered species
to be added to the Endangered Species list. These amendments,
if passed, would also make it harder for scientists to conduct
population research for endangered species.
Forest management is also being undermined by
the Bush Administration, which has created
a group
of five nonscientists,
called the “review
team” to overrule the Sierra Nevada Framework, a plan to
manage forests and reduce the risk of forest fires, which was
put into place by the Clinton Administration. With the new “review
team” in charge and more new legislation on the way,
America could be looking at the complete loss of forests within
the next
10 years.
The Bush Administration is also slowly putting
people sympathetic to its cause into positions
once held
by impartial scientists
whose only goals were-and still are-the betterment
of the country.
Science is the foundation of life as we know
it. We, ourselves, are scientific beings
from the beating
of
our hearts to
each breath we take.
So how can we stop the Bush Administration’s
slow degradation of our planet? We can start on Election Day,
by choosing the
people who have our best interest at
heart, instead of their own.
For more information or to learn how
you can take action, contact UCS at
www.ucsusa.org.