HONOLULU (Jan. 29)- U.S. President George W. Bush’s
State of the Union Address last week marked the first time
the current administration has publicly acknowledged the importance
and threat of global climate change, according to East-West
Center adjunct senior fellow and President of Global Environment
and Energy in the 21st Century, Toufiq Siddiqi.
Siddiqi says the U.S. president signaled the change when he
said in his speech, “America is on the verge of technological
breakthroughs that will enable us to live less dependent on
oil. And these technologies will help us be better stewards
of the environment, and they will help us confront the serious
challenge of global climate change.”
Siddiqi points out that it’s not only the executive branch
of the U.S. government that is recognizing the reality of change
in the global climate. He notes that within the first two weeks
of the new Congress convening, at least eight bills proposing
mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions were introduced
in the Senate. Former Senator and Vice-President Al Gore’s
documentary An Inconvenient Truth dealing with global climate
change has been a box office hit, and many in the Congress
have shared these views for years. Numerous U.S. states have
already established their own specific targets for reducing
greenhouse gases and increasing the share of renewable energy.
Energy independence is not a new goal in Washington. Siddiqi
recalls that President Richard Nixon announced a “Project
Independence” in 1973, President Jimmy Carter called
the energy crisis during his term in office “the moral
equivalent of war,” and subsequent presidents frequently
stated the need to reduce America’s dependence on foreign
oil. However, the costs of finding alternative fuels were always
more expensive than Washington was willing to pay.
But what is new, according to Siddiqi, is an official admission
in Washington that energy use has to be reduced not only for
economic reasons, but also to address global climate change.
The vast majority of scientists agree that greenhouse gases,
predominately carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of
fossil fuels, are the major cause of global climate change.
Many point a finger at the U.S. as the largest contributor
to that problem. Siddiqi said “the United States has
been the largest emitter of CO2 for the last hundred years
or so ... (and) its unwillingness to limit such emissions has
been a major obstacle to implementing a worldwide agreement
to address global climate change.” He notes that although
the U.S. signed the Tokyo Protocol, a modest step toward curtailing
greenhouse gas emissions by industrialized countries, it never
ratified the treaty. That inaction allowed many other industrialized
countries to ignore implementing the Protocol as “there
was no point in their imposing economic hardships on their
population, if the largest emitter in the world was not doing
anything to curb its emissions.”
That rapidly growing economies such as China and India were
not obligated to take similar steps toward emissions curbs
under the Tokyo Protocol as those required for the major industrialized
countries, only served to allow the U.S. and others to ignore
the agreement and to keep burning larger amounts of gas emitting
fuels. Projections, at first glance, may be used to support
the U.S. stance.
Siddiqi said, “China’s emissions of CO2 are likely
to overtake those of the United States sometime during the
next decade. India’s emissions are likely to overtake
Japan’s during that same period.” From that viewpoint,
he admitted, “the case is strong that at least the large
developing countries such as China and India should also start
curbing their emissions.” This is something that neither
Beijing nor New Delhi is ready to do as both countries race
to increase the standard of living of their people.
But, Siddiqi said there is another way to view the problem. “If
we take into consideration the fact that China’s population
is about four times that of the United States, then the situation
looks very different.” He points out that based on CO2
emissions per capita during 2005, “Each American puts
roughly six times as much CO2 in the atmosphere as a Chinese,
and 20 times as much as an Indian.”
Siddiqi said that “clearly the industrialized countries
have most of the responsibility for past emissions of CO2 that
are still in the atmosphere ... (and) all countries, developed
and developing, have a responsibility to limit future emissions.” And
in that shared responsibility, Siddiqi sees a viable basis
for negotiation. “While the industrialized countries
would still be expected to reduce their emissions from earlier
or current levels, rapidly industrializing countries such as
China and India may be willing to accept per capita emissions
targets which lie somewhere between their current levels and
those of the United States.”
And, clearly Siddiqi sees those few lines in Bush’s State
of the Union Address as a major step forward. “The acceptance
by the Bush administration and the U.S. Senate of the reality
and potentially serious consequences of global climate change
is likely to alter the framework of future negotiations to
limit greenhouse gas emissions.”
Dr. Toufiq Siddiqi has more than 30 years experience of research
in the fields of energy and environment, particularly global
climate change. He was formerly Regional Adviser on Energy
in the Environment and Natural Resources Management Division,
UNESCAP, in Bangkok; and a former senior fellow in the Program
on Environment at the East-West Center, where he remains an
adjunct senior fellow. He also was on the faculty of Indiana
University for 10 years. He can be reached at: (808) 944-7456
or by e-mail at siddiqit@EastWestCenter.org.